Walk me through a comparable company analysis.
Pick peers similar in business model, size, growth, margins and geography. Calculate the same multiples for each, usually EV/EBITDA and P/E on trailing and forward numbers. Apply the median and range to your company's metrics, then bridge enterprise value to equity value.
See this answer go from 50 to 90
Example answer
50/100
A comparable company analysis values a company based on how similar public companies trade today. First I pick the peer group. I want companies in the same industry that are about the same size. Then I gather the financials for each peer and calculate the multiples. The main ones are EV to EBITDA and P/E. Then I take the average and apply it to my company. That gives me a market-based value that I'd compare with other methods.
What holds it back
The steps are named but not explained. It doesn't say how the peers are chosen beyond industry and size, it uses an average that one outlier can distort, and there are no numbers.
A comparable company analysis values a company based on how similar public companies trade today. There are four steps. First I pick the peer group. I want companies in the same industry with a similar business model, and then I narrow by size, growth, margins and geography. Second, I gather the financials for each peer. That's market cap and net debt to get enterprise value, plus revenue, EBITDA and net income. Third, I calculate the multiples. The main ones are EV to EBITDA and P/E. Then I take the median of the group. Fourth, I apply those multiples to my company. Say the peer median is 10 times EBITDA and my company has $50 million of EBITDA. That's an enterprise value of $500 million. If it has $100 million of net debt, the equity value is $400 million. That gives me a market-based value that I'd compare with other methods.
A comparable company analysis values a company based on how similar public companies trade today. It's a relative method, so it tells me what the market would pay, not what the business is worth on its own cash flows. There are four steps. First I pick the peer group. I want companies in the same industry with a similar business model, and then I narrow by size, growth, margins and geography. I'd rather have six close peers than fifteen loose ones, because the answer is only as good as the peers. Second, I gather the financials for each peer. That's market cap and net debt, with preferred stock and minority interest where they exist, to get enterprise value, plus revenue, EBITDA and net income. I'd use the last twelve months and next year's estimates, and I'd strip out one-time items so every peer is on the same basis. Third, I calculate the multiples. The main ones are EV to EBITDA and P/E. Then I take the median of the group, not the average, because one outlier can drag an average. Fourth, I apply those multiples to my company. Say the peer median is 10 times EBITDA and my company has $50 million of EBITDA. That's an enterprise value of $500 million. If it has $100 million of net debt, the equity value is $400 million. A P/E multiple would go on net income and give equity value directly. I'd show a range, so 9 to 11 times gives $450 million to $550 million of enterprise value. That gives me a market-based value that I'd compare with other methods. Then I'd ask where in the range my company belongs. If it grows faster or earns better margins than the peers, it deserves the top end. And comps reflect how the market feels today, with no control premium, so they can be too high or too low along with the market.
The numbers, step by step
An invented company with $50 million of EBITDA and $100 million of net debt, valued on a peer median of 10 times EBITDA and a range of 9 to 11 times.
- Enterprise value at the median10 × $50 million
- $500 million
- Equity value$500 million − $100 million net debt
- $400 million
- Low end of the range9 × $50 million
- $450 million
- High end of the range11 × $50 million
- $550 million
What the interviewer listens for
- Do you say how you choose the peers, not only that you choose them?
- Do you get from the multiple to enterprise value and then to equity value?
- Do you use the median and show a range?
- Do you match enterprise value multiples with EBITDA and equity multiples with earnings?
- Do you know what comps leave out?
Common mistakes
- Picking peers by industry alone.Two companies in the same industry with very different growth and margins won't trade at the same multiple.
- Applying an EV to EBITDA multiple and calling the result the share value.That multiple gives enterprise value, and net debt still has to come off.
- Using the average multiple when one peer is far above the rest.The median is the safer middle.
- Mixing time periods, such as one peer's last twelve months against another's forecast year.
More finance technicals
- Which valuation method usually gives the highest value, and why?
- When would you use EV/EBITDA instead of P/E?
- How do you calculate diluted shares with the treasury stock method?
- How would you value a company that is losing money?
- Why is debt cheaper than equity?
Valuation interview questionsAll interview questionsFree technical questionsPaper LBO practice
Ready for an interviewer that talks back?
Start the 7-day free trial and run your first full case with the AI interviewer today.
Start 7-day free trial