When would you not use a DCF to value a company?
See this answer go from 50 to 90
Example answer
50/100
A DCF depends on being able to forecast a company's cash flows with some confidence. So I wouldn't rely on it when the cash flows are too unpredictable. The clearest example is an early-stage company. If it has little revenue and negative cash flow, the forecast is mostly guesswork. The second case is banks and other financial institutions. They're just valued differently. A DCF also has a lot of assumptions, so small changes can move the answer a lot.
What holds it back
Two good cases are named, but banks get no reason at all. The last line is a general complaint about DCFs, which doesn't answer when you'd avoid one.
A DCF depends on being able to forecast a company's cash flows with some confidence. So I wouldn't rely on it when the cash flows are too unpredictable. The whole method is a forecast discounted back to today, so a bad forecast gives a bad value. The clearest example is an early-stage company. If it has little revenue and negative cash flow, the forecast is mostly guesswork. Almost all of the value ends up in a terminal value that's many years away, so the answer is driven by assumptions I can't check. The second case is banks and other financial institutions. For a bank, debt is part of operations, not just financing, so unlevered free cash flow and enterprise value don't mean much. Deposits are its raw material, and interest is both its main revenue and its main cost. I'd use a different method for those.
A DCF depends on being able to forecast a company's cash flows with some confidence. So I wouldn't rely on it when the cash flows are too unpredictable. The whole method is a forecast discounted back to today, so a bad forecast gives a bad value. The clearest example is an early-stage company. If it has little revenue and negative cash flow, the forecast is mostly guesswork. Almost all of the value ends up in a terminal value that's many years away, so the answer is driven by assumptions I can't check. There I'd use revenue multiples from comparable companies or recent funding rounds. The second case is banks and other financial institutions. For a bank, debt is part of operations, not just financing, so unlevered free cash flow and enterprise value don't mean much. Deposits are its raw material, and interest is both its main revenue and its main cost. I'd use a dividend discount model or a residual income model, along with multiples like price to book. The third is very cyclical or distressed companies. With a commodity producer, the forecast depends on a price nobody can predict. With a distressed company, the real question is whether it survives, so a restructuring or liquidation analysis fits better. So the question I'd ask is whether I can trust the forecast and whether free cash flow is the right measure. If not, I'd use a method that fits the business.
What the interviewer listens for
- Do you tie the answer to how predictable the cash flows are?
- Do you know why banks are a special case?
- Can you say what you'd use instead in each case?
- Do you give concrete examples?
More finance technicals
- Pitch me a stock.
- Why private equity?
- Walk me through a DCF.
- How do the three financial statements link together?
- Depreciation goes up by $10. Walk me through the three statements.
All interview questionsFree technical questionsPaper LBO practice
Ready for an interviewer that talks back?
Start the 7-day free trial and run your first full case with the AI interviewer today.
Start 7-day free trial