Precedent transactions analysis, deal by deal

Precedent transactions analysis values a company at the multiples buyers paid for similar companies in past acquisitions. Build each deal's transaction value from the offer, divide by the target's LTM EBITDA at announcement, take the median and middle range, and apply it to the company you are valuing. Because those prices include a premium for control, the result usually sits above trading comps: in our worked example $18.25 to $20.75 a share, against $16.00 at the comps median. Soreno, an AI voice interview practice app for consulting, investment banking and other finance candidates, runs a free enterprise value calculator with no sign-up, and mock technical interviews where an AI interviewer asks you to walk through precedents and pushes on your deal set.

Updated

  • Past deals, not today's prices. The multiple is what a buyer paid for the whole company, premium included.
  • Build the value from the offer. Offer price × diluted shares at that price, plus the debt the buyer takes on, less cash.
  • EBITDA at announcement. The target's last twelve months as of the deal, not today.
  • Read the terms. Earnouts and tax step-ups change what a headline multiple means.
  • Twelve questions below. Short answers in our words, with the follow-ups to expect.

Precedent transactions in three examples

Every company, deal and number here is invented by Soreno for practice, in millions of dollars. The company being valued is Harlow Tools: $80 million of LTM EBITDA, $160 million of net debt and 40 million diluted shares, the same invented company as our comparable company analysis guide, where the peers' median gave $16.00 a share. Example 1 uses the deal set as a screen shows it. Examples 2 and 3 open three of those deals.

Example 1: from a deal set to a value range$18.25 to $20.75
  1. 1. The deals

    Six acquisitions of industrial equipment makers since 2022

    Larchmont Controls (2025): $1,150 million ÷ $100 million = 11.5x. Sutter Valve (2024): $780 million ÷ $65 million = 12.0x. Ridgeway Pumps (2025): $2,600 million ÷ $200 million = 13.0x. Tamsin Instruments (2023): $1,890 million ÷ $180 million = 10.5x. Ovid Hydraulics (2022): $990 million ÷ $90 million = 11.0x. Pell Automation (2026): $1,400 million ÷ $112 million = 12.5x.

  2. 2. Summarize

    Median 11.75x

    Sorted: 10.5x, 11.0x, 11.5x, 12.0x, 12.5x, 13.0x. The middle two are 11.5x and 12.0x, so the median is 11.75x. The 25th to 75th percentile, Excel's QUARTILE.INC, is our convention: 11.125x to 12.375x.

  3. 3. Enterprise value

    $890 million to $990 million

    Apply the range to the target's $80 million of LTM EBITDA: 11.125x × 80 = $890 million and 12.375x × 80 = $990 million. At the median, $940 million.

  4. 4. Per share

    $18.25 to $20.75

    Less $160 million of net debt, divided by 40 million shares: $18.25 to $20.75, $19.50 at the median.

  5. 5. Read it

    22% above the comps median

    $19.50 against $16.00 from trading comps. A gap in this direction is what you'd expect, since deal prices include control. Say both numbers, and that a buyer would anchor on the lower one and a seller on the higher.

Example 2: one deal's value from the press release11.5x

A buyer agrees to pay $40.00 cash a share for Larchmont Controls, whose stock closed at $32.00 before the deal news. Larchmont's last filing shows 25 million basic shares, 2.5 million options with a $24.00 strike, 0.5 million restricted stock units that vest when the company is sold, $180 million of debt the buyer repays at closing and $90 million of cash. Its year ends in December and the deal is announced after its third quarter. EBITDA was $94 million last year, $78 million for the first nine months of this year and $72 million for the same nine months last year. No preferred stock, no noncontrolling interest.

  1. 1. Premium

    25%

    $40.00 ÷ $32.00 − 1 = 25%. Measure it against the price before the news, since the stock jumps once a deal leaks.

  2. 2. Diluted shares at the offer

    26.5 million

    Use the offer price, not the old share price, in the treasury stock method. The options bring in 2.5 × $24.00 = $60 million, which buys back 1.5 million shares at $40.00, so 1 million net new shares. Add the 0.5 million RSUs: 25 + 1 + 0.5 = 26.5 million.

  3. 3. Equity purchase price

    $1,060 million

    26.5 million × $40.00 = $1,060 million. That is the figure a press release often headlines.

  4. 4. Transaction value

    $1,150 million

    Add the $180 million of debt and take off the $90 million of cash: $1,060 million + 180 − 90 = $1,150 million.

  5. 5. LTM at announcement

    94 + 78 − 72 = 100

    Last year, plus this year's nine months, less last year's nine months: $100 million. The multiple is $1,150 million ÷ $100 million = 11.5x, Larchmont's row in example 1.

Example 3: an earnout and a tax step-upMedian 11.75x becomes 11.58x

Two deals in the set aren't what their headline says. Sutter Valve's buyer paid $715 million at closing plus up to $100 million more if Sutter hits a profit goal, an earnout the buyer valued at $65 million when the deal closed. Sutter's LTM EBITDA was $65 million. Ridgeway Pumps was sold by a larger group for $2,600 million with a section 338(h)(10) election. Ridgeway's LTM EBITDA was $200 million and its assets had a tax basis of $500 million. For the tax math we assume, as our simplification, a 25% tax rate, that the whole step-up is goodwill and other intangibles deducted evenly over 15 years from year 1, that the buyer has the profits to use every deduction, and a 10% discount rate.

  1. A1. Three ways to count

    11.00x, 12.00x or 12.54x

    Upfront only: $715 million ÷ $65 million = 11.00x. Upfront plus the earnout at its value at closing: $780 million ÷ $65 million = 12.00x. Upfront plus the maximum: $815 million ÷ $65 million = 12.54x.

  2. A2. Pick one and say why

    Fair value at closing, our convention

    US accounting asks the buyer to record contingent consideration at its fair value on the acquisition date, so that figure is in the buyer's filings and is the closest thing to what was really paid. The maximum overstates the price. Upfront alone understates it. Whatever you pick, use it for every deal in the set and footnote it.

  3. B1. What the election does

    A $2,100 million step-up

    With a 338 election, a stock purchase is treated for tax as a sale of the target's assets, so the buyer's tax basis in them rises from $500 million to, in our simplified version, the price paid, $2,600 million. That $2,100 million step-up is deducted at $140 million a year for 15 years.

  4. B2. What the deductions are worth

    $266.2 million

    $140 million × 25% = $35 million of tax saved a year. Fifteen years of that at 10% is $35 million × 7.606 = $266.2 million today. Part of the price paid for that tax asset, not for Ridgeway's earnings.

  5. B3. Net it out

    13.00x becomes 11.67x

    ($2,600 million − $266.2 million) ÷ $200 million = 11.67x. Netting it out is our convention, so the multiple compares with deals that had no step-up. Some bankers keep the headline and footnote it instead.

  6. C. What it changes

    Range 11.13x to 11.92x

    With Ridgeway at 11.67x, the median falls from 11.75x to 11.58x and the 75th percentile from 12.38x to 11.92x. The target's range becomes $18.25 to $19.83 a share, $19.17 at the median.

From FASB Statement No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations, now in ASC 805, IRS: Instructions for Form 8023 (section 338) and IRS: Instructions for Form 4562.

What the interviewer checks on precedents

In our experience the walk-through is quick, and the credit goes to judgment: which deals belong, what the multiple really measured, and how this method sits against comps.

  • The steps in order

    Set criteria, find deals, build each one's transaction value and LTM EBITDA at announcement, compute the multiples, then apply the median and range to the target.

  • Time and market

    Deals from a different credit market or a sector boom can carry different multiples. Say how far back you would go and why.

  • Who the buyer was

    Strategic buyers can pay for synergies. Financial sponsors are limited by the returns their debt allows. Mixing both is fine if you can say which end of the range each sits at.

  • The control premium

    Precedents usually come out above trading comps. A strong answer says why and what that means for a buyer and a seller.

12 precedent transactions interview questions

The short answers are ours. The note says what else a strong answer covers.

The method4 questions
  1. Walk me through a precedent transactions analysis.

    Show follow-ups

    Short answer. Pick acquisitions of similar companies, usually from recent years. For each, build the transaction value from the offer and the target's LTM EBITDA or revenue at announcement. Compute the multiples, take the median and middle range, and apply them to the company you are valuing.

    Says how it differs from comps in one line: past control prices, not today's minority trading. Practice it, see a model answer

    • “How far back would you go?”
    • “What if there are only three deals?”
  2. How do you get from a per-share offer price to a transaction value?

    Show follow-ups

    Short answer. Multiply the offer by diluted shares counted at the offer price, which gives the equity purchase price. Then add the debt the buyer takes on or repays, preferred stock and noncontrolling interest, and take off cash.

    Uses the offer price in the treasury stock method, as in example 2.

  3. How old can a precedent deal be?

    Show follow-ups

    Short answer. There is no fixed rule. In our experience bankers look at the last three to five years and go further back only when there are few deals, noting where markets were different.

    Names one reason a deal from an unusual market would mislead.

  4. Why use LTM EBITDA at announcement rather than today?

    Show follow-ups

    Short answer. Because the buyer priced the deal on what it knew then. Using a later number changes the multiple the buyer actually paid.

    Shows the stub-period math: last year, plus this year's year to date, less last year's.

Premiums and buyers4 questions
  1. What is a control premium, and how big is it usually?

    Show follow-ups

    Short answer. It is the amount a buyer pays above the target's undisturbed share price to own the whole company. It varies widely by deal and market, so measure it from the price before any news.

    Gives a range only as what you have seen in your own set, not as a rule. Practice it, see a model answer

  2. Which valuation method usually gives the highest value?

    Show follow-ups

    Short answer. Usually precedent transactions, because the prices include control premiums and sometimes synergies. A DCF can come out higher or lower depending on its assumptions.

    Uses usually, and names a case where comps beat precedents. Practice it, see a model answer

  3. Why can a strategic buyer usually pay more than a private equity firm?

    Show follow-ups

    Short answer. A strategic buyer can count on synergies, such as cutting shared costs or selling more through its own channels. A sponsor's price is capped by the debt the company can carry and the return its fund needs.

    Explains how that shows up in a precedent set that mixes both kinds of buyer. Practice it, see a model answer

  4. Tell me about a recent deal you've followed.

    Show follow-ups

    Short answer. Name the buyer, the target, the price and the multiple, then why the buyer did it and whether the price made sense.

    Has the transaction value and multiple ready, built the way this page builds them. Practice it, see a model answer

Deal terms4 questions
  1. What is an earnout, and how does it affect the multiple?

    Show follow-ups

    Short answer. Part of the price is paid later if the business hits a goal. Count it consistently: we use its fair value at closing, which the buyer records, rather than the maximum.

    Works the three versions of one deal, as in example 3. Practice it, see a model answer

  2. What's the difference between an asset deal, a stock deal and a 338(h)(10) election?

    Show follow-ups

    Short answer. In an asset deal the buyer gets a new, higher tax basis in the assets. In a stock deal the target's assets normally keep their old tax basis, and the buyer gets a new basis only in the shares it bought. A 338(h)(10) election lets a stock purchase be treated as an asset sale for tax, so the buyer gets the step-up.

    Says why a buyer might pay more for a deal with a step-up. Practice it, see a model answer

  3. Would a buyer rather pay with cash, debt or stock?

    Show follow-ups

    Short answer. It depends on what each costs the buyer: interest after tax for debt, lost interest on cash, and the earnings yield of its own shares for stock. Stock also shares the risk with the seller.

    Links the form of payment to how the deal shows up in the precedent set. Practice it, see a model answer

  4. How would you show precedents next to comps and a DCF?

    Show follow-ups

    Short answer. As one bar on a football field chart, the range of implied values per share, with the current price or offer drawn across it.

    Says which bar you would trust most for this company. Practice it, see a model answer

More to prepare with

Common precedent transactions mistakes
  • Equity price as the deal value

    Larchmont's headline is $1,060 million, but the buyer also took on $180 million of debt and got $90 million of cash. The multiple needs $1,150 million.

  • Today's share price in the dilution math

    Options are counted at the offer price, which is what holders receive.

  • Today's EBITDA

    The multiple uses the target's LTM EBITDA when the deal was announced.

  • The earnout at its maximum

    That figure may never be paid. Use one rule for every deal and say which.

  • Ignoring tax structure

    Ridgeway's 13.0x includes about $266.2 million paid for tax savings in our example.

  • Premium measured from a leaked price

    Use the price before rumors or news, or the premium looks smaller than it was.

Defend your deal set out loud

Soreno's AI interviewer asks the walk-through, then why a 2022 deal is in your set, how you counted the earnout and why precedents came out above comps. You get a scored report on your answer.

Questions people ask

What is precedent transactions analysis?

A valuation method that uses the multiples buyers paid in past acquisitions of similar companies. Bankers also call it transaction comps or deal comps.

Why are precedent transaction multiples usually higher than trading comps?

Buyers pay a premium to control the whole company, and strategic buyers may pay for synergies. Trading multiples come from share prices for small stakes.

Where do you find the numbers for a deal?

For public targets, the deal announcement and the merger documents filed with the SEC, plus the target's last 10-K and 10-Q for share counts, debt and EBITDA. For private targets the price is often not disclosed, which limits the set.

How do you count an earnout?

Pick one rule and apply it to every deal. US accounting has the buyer record contingent consideration at its fair value on the acquisition date, which makes that figure a sensible default.

What does a section 338 election do?

For tax, the target is treated as having sold all of its assets on the acquisition date and bought them back as a new corporation, so the buyer gets a stepped-up basis. A 338(h)(10) election can only be made when the target is bought from a selling consolidated group, a selling affiliate or S corporation shareholders.

How many deals should be in a precedent set?

In our experience five to ten. Fewer than four makes the median fragile, and padding the set with old or unlike deals is worse than a short list.

Should I use revenue or EBITDA multiples?

EBITDA when the targets were profitable, revenue when many were not or when margins differ for reasons the buyer could fix. Show both if the set is mixed.

Keep going