Why would one company want to acquire another?
Because buying can be faster or cheaper than building. Group reasons into growth, synergies, new capabilities and defense against rivals, with financial reasons secondary. A deal creates value only if benefits exceed the premium, and overpaying, inflated synergies or poor integration destroy it.
See this answer go from 50 to 90
Example answer
50/100
A company acquires another when buying is a faster or cheaper way to reach a goal than building it. I'd group the reasons into four. First, growth. An acquisition makes the company bigger and adds revenue. Second, synergies. The two companies together can earn more than they do apart. Third, capabilities. The target may have technology the buyer wants. Fourth, defense. A buyer may acquire a competitor. In the end it comes down to creating value for shareholders.
What holds it back
The four headings are right, but growth is just getting bigger, the rest are one-liners, and "creating value for shareholders" could end any finance answer. It never says when an acquisition is a bad idea.
A company acquires another when buying is a faster or cheaper way to reach a goal than building it. I'd group the reasons into four. First, growth. If the buyer's own market is slowing, an acquisition brings new customers, products or regions right away. Second, synergies. The two companies together can earn more than they do apart, mostly by cutting duplicated costs like overlapping offices and teams. Third, capabilities. The target may have technology, patents, talent or a brand that the buyer can't easily develop itself. Fourth, defense. A buyer may acquire a competitor to gain scale, or to keep a rival from getting the target first. None of this means the deal is a good one. The buyer pays a premium, so the benefits have to be worth more than that premium.
A company acquires another when buying is a faster or cheaper way to reach a goal than building it. I'd group the reasons into four. First, growth. If the buyer's own market is slowing, an acquisition brings new customers, products or regions right away. Building the same position could take years. Second, synergies. The two companies together can earn more than they do apart, mostly by cutting duplicated costs like overlapping offices and teams. Third, capabilities. The target may have technology, patents, talent or a brand that the buyer can't easily develop itself. Fourth, defense. A buyer may acquire a competitor to gain scale, or to keep a rival from getting the target first. It may also buy a supplier or distributor to secure its supply chain. There are financial reasons too, like a target that looks undervalued, but I'd rank those below the strategic ones. None of this means the deal is a good one. The buyer pays a premium over what the target is worth alone, so the benefits have to be worth more than that premium. Deals destroy value when the buyer overpays, overestimates synergies, or handles the integration badly and loses customers and key people. I'd be most skeptical of a deal justified mainly by getting bigger or by diversifying. Shareholders can diversify on their own, and size alone doesn't create value. So for any deal I'd ask one question. What can these two companies do together that they couldn't do apart, and is that worth more than the premium?
What the interviewer listens for
- Do you group the reasons instead of listing everything you can think of?
- Do you give build versus buy as the underlying logic?
- Do you mention the premium and what has to justify it?
- Do you know when acquisitions destroy value?
Common mistakes
- Listing eight reasons with no grouping.Three or four clear groups are easier to follow and to remember.
- Giving "to get bigger" as a reason.Size alone doesn't help shareholders unless it brings lower costs, new customers or something the buyer couldn't build.
- Naming a real deal and getting its details wrong.Stick to the logic unless you know the deal well.
- Presenting every reason as good.The interviewer wants to hear that the buyer pays a premium and that many rationales don't justify it.
More finance technicals
- How do you tell whether an acquisition is accretive or dilutive?
- Walk me through a merger model.
- What are synergies, and which kind would you trust more?
- Would a buyer rather pay for an acquisition with cash, debt or stock?
- Walk me through a sell-side M&A process.
M&A interview questionsAll interview questionsFree technical questionsPaper LBO practice
Ready for an interviewer that talks back?
Start the 7-day free trial and run your first full case with the AI interviewer today.
Start 7-day free trial