How do you tell whether an acquisition is accretive or dilutive?
See this answer go from 50 to 90
Example answer
50/100
A deal is accretive if the buyer's earnings per share go up after the acquisition, and dilutive if they go down. You'd build a merger model to work it out. It depends a lot on how the buyer pays. There's a shortcut for an all-stock deal. If the buyer's P/E is higher than the target's P/E, the deal is accretive. Buyers generally prefer accretive deals.
What holds it back
The definition and the P/E shortcut are correct, but the middle is missing. It never says what you compare, or how cash, debt and stock each change the result.
A deal is accretive if the buyer's earnings per share go up after the acquisition, and dilutive if they go down. So I compare pro forma EPS for the combined company with the buyer's standalone EPS. To get pro forma EPS, I add the two companies' net income and adjust for the financing. It depends a lot on how the buyer pays. With cash, the buyer gives up the interest it was earning. With debt, it pays new interest. With stock, the share count goes up. Then I divide the combined net income by the new share count. There's a shortcut for an all-stock deal. If the buyer's P/E is higher than the target's P/E, the deal is accretive. For cash or debt, I compare the after-tax cost of that cash or debt with the target's earnings yield, which is its earnings divided by the purchase price. If the yield is higher than the cost, it's accretive.
A deal is accretive if the buyer's earnings per share go up after the acquisition, and dilutive if they go down. So I compare pro forma EPS for the combined company with the buyer's standalone EPS. To get pro forma EPS, I add the two companies' net income and adjust for the financing. It depends a lot on how the buyer pays. With cash, the buyer gives up the interest it was earning. With debt, it pays new interest. With stock, the share count goes up. I'd also include synergies, and the extra amortization from any intangibles written up in the deal. Then I divide the combined net income by the new share count. There's a shortcut for an all-stock deal. If the buyer's P/E is higher than the target's P/E, the deal is accretive. That's because the buyer is paying with shares that are valued more highly than the earnings it's buying. I'd use the target's P/E at the price being paid, including the premium. For cash or debt, I compare the after-tax cost of that cash or debt with the target's earnings yield, which is its earnings divided by the purchase price. If the yield is higher than the cost, it's accretive. One caution is that accretive doesn't mean the deal creates value. A buyer with a high P/E can make almost any stock deal look accretive, and it could still be overpaying.
What the interviewer listens for
- Do you define it as pro forma EPS against the buyer's standalone EPS?
- Do you cover cash, debt and stock separately?
- Do you know the P/E shortcut and when it applies?
- Do you separate accretion from value creation?
More finance technicals
- What makes a company a good LBO candidate?
- Two companies have the same earnings but trade at different P/E multiples. Why?
- A company raises $100 of debt to buy equipment. Walk me through the three statements at the time of purchase.
- What is working capital, and why does it matter for cash flow?
- What is EBITDA, and why do bankers use it?
All interview questionsFree technical questionsPaper LBO practice
Ready for an interviewer that talks back?
Start the 7-day free trial and run your first full case with the AI interviewer today.
Start 7-day free trial