Why would a company do a deal that's dilutive?

Separate EPS from value: a deal creates value if it earns more than the cost of capital. Then give concrete reasons, a fast-growing target, synergies that arrive later and non-cash amortization, and say dilution still needs a believable path to accretion.

How a 90-point answer starts

Because next year's EPS isn't the same thing as value. A deal creates value if the return on the full price, premium included, beats the buyer's cost of capital over time.

See the full answer, the 50 and 70 versions, and what moves each score up.

Practice this question free

The numbers, step by step

Figures in millions except per share. The buyer earns $100 on 100 shares at $15. It pays $500 in stock for a target earning $20. Then the target grows 25% a year and the buyer 5%.

New shares issued$500 ÷ $15
about 33 million
Pro forma EPS in year one($100 + $20) ÷ (100 + 33.3)
$0.90
Dilution$0.90 ÷ $1.00 − 1
10% dilutive
Buyer alone, year three EPS$1.00 × 1.05^3
about $1.158
Combined, year three EPS($100 × 1.05^3 + $20 × 1.25^3) ÷ 133.3
about $1.161

What the interviewer listens for

  • Do you separate EPS from value creation?
  • Do you give concrete reasons like growth and synergy timing?
  • Do you know non-cash amortization can cause GAAP dilution?
  • Do you say dilution still needs a believable payoff?

Common mistakes

  • Saying a company should never do a dilutive deal.Value comes from returns above the cost of capital, not year-one EPS.
  • Giving only vague strategic reasons.Name concrete ones like growth, synergy timing and non-cash amortization.
  • Saying dilution doesn't matter.Markets punish dilution that has no clear path to accretion.
  • Treating accretion as proof a deal is good, which is the same mistake in reverse.

Likely follow-ups

  • Is an accretive deal always a good deal?No, because a buyer with a high P/E can make almost any stock deal accretive while overpaying. The test is the return on the price against the cost of capital.
  • What is cash EPS?EPS with the after-tax amortization of acquired intangibles, and sometimes other non-cash charges, added back. Frequent acquirers often report it next to GAAP EPS.

More finance technicals

M&A interview questionsAll interview questionsFree technical questionsPaper LBO practice

Ready for an interviewer that talks back?

Start the 7-day free trial and answer your first technical question out loud to the AI interviewer today.

Start your free week