A company writes down an asset by $100. Walk me through the three statements.
At 25% tax, if deductible, net income falls $75, the $100 is added back, and cash rises $25 from the tax saving. The asset falls $100 and retained earnings fall $75. If not deductible, a $25 deferred tax asset replaces that cash.
See this answer go from 50 to 90
Example answer
50/100
On the income statement, the write-down is a $100 expense, so pre-tax income falls by $100. Net income falls by a bit less, because of tax.
On the cash flow statement, net income is down at the top. No cash left the business when the asset was written down, so I add the full $100 back in cash flow from operations.
On the balance sheet, the asset is down $100 and cash moves a little. Retained earnings are down as well, so it balances.
What holds it back
The order and the add-back are right, but there's no tax rate, so net income, cash and retained earnings have no numbers. "It balances" is claimed, not shown.
I'll assume a 25% tax rate, and I'll treat the write-down as deductible for tax. On the income statement, the write-down is a $100 expense, so pre-tax income falls by $100. The tax bill falls by $25, so net income is down $75. On the cash flow statement, net income is down $75 at the top. No cash left the business when the asset was written down, so I add the full $100 back in cash flow from operations. That leaves cash flow from operations up by $25, and with nothing in investing or financing, cash is up $25. On the balance sheet, the asset is down $100 and cash is up $25, so total assets are down $75. Liabilities don't move. Retained earnings are down $75 from the lower net income, so both sides are down $75 and it balances.
I'll assume a 25% tax rate, and to begin with I'll treat the write-down as deductible for tax. On the income statement, the write-down is a $100 expense, so pre-tax income falls by $100. The tax bill falls by $25, so net income is down $75. On the cash flow statement, net income is down $75 at the top. No cash left the business when the asset was written down, so I add the full $100 back in cash flow from operations. That leaves cash flow from operations up by $25, and with nothing in investing or financing, cash is up $25. On the balance sheet, the asset is down $100 and cash is up $25, so total assets are down $75. Liabilities don't move. Retained earnings are down $75 from the lower net income, so both sides are down $75 and it balances. The intuition is that a write-down is the company admitting an asset is worth less than the books say. Nothing is paid out, so the only cash effect is the lower tax bill. The follow-up I'd expect is whether that tax saving is real. Often it isn't right away, because many write-downs can't be deducted until the asset is sold or scrapped. In that case net income is still down $75, but no cash tax is saved today. The $25 becomes a deferred tax asset. On the cash flow statement I'd add back $100 and subtract the $25 rise in the deferred tax asset, so cash doesn't change. On the balance sheet the asset is down $100 and the deferred tax asset is up $25, so assets are still down $75 against the $75 drop in retained earnings.
The numbers, step by step
A $100 write-down at a 25% tax rate, first treated as tax deductible now, then as deductible only later.
- Tax saved$100 × 25%
- $25
- Net income−$100 + $25
- -$75
- Cash flow from operations−$75 + $100 add-back
- $25
- Total assets−$100 asset + $25 cash
- -$75
- Not deductible yet: change in cash−$75 + $100 − $25 deferred tax asset
- $0
- Not deductible yet: total assets−$100 asset + $25 deferred tax asset
- -$75
What the interviewer listens for
- Do you state a tax rate before the first number?
- Do you add back the full $100, not the after-tax $75?
- Do you show both sides of the balance sheet down by $75?
- Do you know the tax saving depends on the write-down being deductible?
Common mistakes
- Saying cash goes down because the company lost $100 of value.A write-down is non-cash, and if it's deductible cash goes up by the tax saved.
- Adding back $75 when the add-back is the whole $100.The tax effect is already inside net income.
- Assuming the tax deduction without saying so.If the write-down isn't deductible yet, the $25 is a deferred tax asset and cash doesn't move.
- Reducing the asset by $75 after tax.The asset falls by the full $100, and the tax effect shows up in cash or deferred taxes.
More finance technicals
- A company makes a $100 sale on credit. What happens on the three statements?
- A company records $10 of stock-based compensation. Walk me through the three statements.
- What is PIK interest, and how does $10 of it flow through the three statements?
- If you could look at only one financial statement to judge a company, which would you choose and why?
- How can a company be profitable and still run out of cash?
Accounting interview questionsAll interview questionsFree technical questionsPaper LBO practice
Ready for an interviewer that talks back?
Start the 7-day free trial and run your first full case with the AI interviewer today.
Start 7-day free trial