A company raises $100 of debt to buy equipment. Walk me through the three statements at the time of purchase.
See this answer go from 50 to 90
Example answer
50/100
At the time of purchase, nothing changes on the income statement. The income statement would only change later on. On the cash flow statement, raising the debt is a $100 inflow in cash flow from financing. Buying the equipment is a $100 outflow in cash flow from investing. So cash goes up and then back down. On the balance sheet you'd have more equipment and more debt.
What holds it back
The key calls are right, but it's loose. It doesn't explain why the income statement is untouched, and the balance sheet is described without numbers or a check that it balances.
At the time of purchase, nothing changes on the income statement. Raising debt isn't revenue, and buying equipment isn't an expense. It's a capital expenditure, so it goes on the balance sheet as an asset. On the cash flow statement, raising the debt is a $100 inflow in cash flow from financing. Buying the equipment is a $100 outflow in cash flow from investing. So cash goes up and then back down. Both items sit outside cash flow from operations, which doesn't change, so the net change in cash is zero. On the balance sheet, PP&E is up by $100 on the assets side and cash is unchanged. Debt is up by $100 on the liabilities side. Equity doesn't change, so both sides are up by $100 and it balances. The company is bigger by $100 on each side, but shareholders are no better or worse off.
At the time of purchase, nothing changes on the income statement. Raising debt isn't revenue, and buying equipment isn't an expense. It's a capital expenditure, so it goes on the balance sheet as an asset. There's no interest or depreciation yet either, because no time has passed. On the cash flow statement, raising the debt is a $100 inflow in cash flow from financing. Buying the equipment is a $100 outflow in cash flow from investing. So cash goes up and then back down. Both items sit outside cash flow from operations, which doesn't change, so the net change in cash is zero. On the balance sheet, PP&E is up by $100 on the assets side and cash is unchanged. Debt is up by $100 on the liabilities side. Equity doesn't change, so both sides are up by $100 and it balances. The company is bigger by $100 on each side, but shareholders are no better or worse off. That's only at the time of purchase. Later on, the income statement does change. Say after one year, with 10% interest and a ten-year useful life, there's $10 of interest and $10 of depreciation, so pre-tax income is down by $20. At a 25% tax rate, net income is down by $15. On the cash flow statement for that year, I add back the $10 of depreciation, so cash is down by $5, assuming no principal is repaid. On the balance sheet, cash is down $5 and PP&E is down $10, so assets are down $15, which matches the $15 drop in retained earnings.
What the interviewer listens for
- Do you say right away that the income statement doesn't change?
- Do you put the debt in financing and the equipment in investing?
- Do you state that the net change in cash is zero?
- Do you keep the purchase separate from what happens later?
More finance technicals
- What is working capital, and why does it matter for cash flow?
- What is EBITDA, and why do bankers use it?
- When would you not use a DCF to value a company?
- Pitch me a stock.
- Why private equity?
All interview questionsFree technical questionsPaper LBO practice
Ready for an interviewer that talks back?
Start the 7-day free trial and run your first full case with the AI interviewer today.
Start 7-day free trial