8 Practice Market Sizing Questions to Master for Your 2026 Interviews

Market sizing questions are more than a test of your math skills; they are a direct look into your structured thinking, business sense, and ability to manage ambiguity under pressure. Interviewers at top consulting and finance firms use these prompts to see how you deconstruct a complex problem and build a logical, defensible argument from limited information. A weak performance on a market sizing case is one of the quickest ways for an otherwise strong candidate to receive a rejection.

This guide is designed to prevent that. It provides a curated set of practice market sizing questions that progress from foundational techniques suitable for junior candidates to advanced scenarios faced by experienced hires. We will cover everything from classic top-down estimations to nuanced approaches like regulatory constraint analysis and future market sizing.

Each question is a complete, self-contained drill. You will get:

• A clear, interview-style prompt.
• Logical assumptions to guide your framework.
• A detailed, step-by-step solution.
• Target timing to build interview-level speed.
• Common mistakes to avoid.

By working through these examples, you will build the analytical muscle, speed, and confidence required to turn a daunting case question into an opportunity to showcase your problem-solving talent.

1. Fermi Estimation with Top-Down Market Sizing

The top-down approach is a foundational method for solving practice market sizing questions, starting with the largest possible population and narrowing it down through logical segmentation. This technique, often associated with Fermi estimation, is about making educated guesses to arrive at a "good enough" answer quickly. You begin with the total addressable market (TAM) and apply filters like population segments, penetration rates, and usage frequency to isolate the relevant market slice.

For example, a classic McKinsey case might ask you to estimate the U.S. smartphone market. You would start with the total U.S. population (around 330 million), segment it by age, exclude groups with low ownership (e.g., young children), apply an ownership percentage for the remaining population, and finally multiply by the average revenue per user to find the total market value.

How to Implement This Approach

A structured breakdown prevents your calculation from becoming disorganized. The key is to state your assumptions clearly at each step and use round numbers to simplify mental math.

• Start Broad: Begin with a well-known, high-level number (e.g., population of a country, number of households).
• Segment Logically: Break down the initial number into smaller, more relevant groups. A simple 2x2 matrix can help organize segments, such as by income level and geographic region.
• Apply Filters: Use percentages and rates (e.g., penetration rate, purchase frequency, average price) to pare down each segment to its core market potential.
• Sanity Check: Once you have a final number, compare it to a known figure. Does your estimate for the coffee shop market seem reasonable compared to Starbucks' annual revenue? This final check adds credibility.

Key Insight: The goal isn't perfect accuracy but a demonstration of logical, structured thinking. Interviewers want to see how you arrive at an answer, not just the answer itself.

This method is highly effective for B2C markets or any problem where a clear, overarching population figure is available. For a deeper dive into the mechanics, you can learn more about what market sizing is and how different approaches compare.

2. Bottom-Up Build: Unit Economics Market Sizing

In contrast to the top-down method, a bottom-up build starts from the most granular level: a single customer or transaction. This approach is fundamental for practice market sizing questions in B2B, subscription, or transaction-based business models. Instead of segmenting a large population, you calculate the value or activity of a single unit and scale it up by the total number of potential units.

For instance, a Goldman Sachs case might ask you to size Uber's market. A bottom-up approach would involve estimating the average rides per driver per day, multiplying by the number of active drivers, and then multiplying by the average fare. Similarly, a private equity interview could require valuing a SaaS platform by calculating seats per company × number of potential customer companies × annual subscription price.

How to Implement This Approach

A successful bottom-up analysis hinges on building a logical and defensible "unit" and then scaling it accurately. Clear assumptions about customer behavior and value are critical.

• Start with a Single Unit: Define your core unit. This could be one customer, one transaction, one store, or one subscription. Be specific (e.g., "a single premium subscriber" or "one delivery").
• Calculate Unit Value: Determine the revenue or activity associated with that unit over a specific period (e.g., average order value, annual contract value, daily rides).
• Estimate Total Addressable Units: Calculate the total number of these units in the market (e.g., total number of small businesses that need accounting software, total number of daily commuters).
• Synthesize and Sanity Check: Multiply the unit value by the total number of units to get your market size. Compare your unit economics assumptions (like price or purchase frequency) against known competitors to ensure they are realistic.

Key Insight: This method forces you to think about the fundamental drivers of a business's revenue. It demonstrates a deep understanding of how a company actually makes money, which is highly valued in finance and strategy interviews.

The bottom-up build is especially useful when a total population is difficult to define or when the market is niche. To get a better handle on the core calculations, you can explore the fundamentals of what unit economics are and how they drive business valuation.

3. Comparable Company Benchmarking

When direct population data is scarce or unreliable, comparable company benchmarking offers a powerful alternative for solving practice market sizing questions. This approach uses the financial metrics of known public companies to infer the size of the total market. By taking a company's reported revenue and dividing it by its estimated market share, you can reverse-engineer a credible market size. This method is common in investment banking and equity research.

For instance, a Goldman Sachs case might ask you to size the global streaming market. You could start with Netflix's annual revenue (around $34 billion), estimate its global market share (say, 20-25%), and calculate a total market size of $136-$170 billion. Similarly, you could estimate the global luxury goods market by using LVMH's revenue and its implied market share.

How to Implement This Approach

Success with this method depends on justifying your assumptions about market share and choosing appropriate comparable companies. The goal is to build a logical bridge from a known data point (company revenue) to an unknown one (total market size).

• Name Your Comps: Start by explicitly stating the companies you are using as benchmarks (e.g., "I'll use Coursera and Udemy as proxies for the e-learning market"). State their known revenues upfront.
• Justify Market Share: Clearly explain your rationale for the market share assumption. Acknowledge that it's an estimate and consider testing a small range (e.g., "Assuming Netflix holds between 20-25% of the market...").
• Triangulate with Multiple Comps: If possible, use two or three different companies and see if your final estimates converge. This adds significant strength to your analysis and shows you can cross-reference your logic.
• Combine with Other Methods: For a truly robust answer, use a comparable benchmark as a sanity check for a top-down or bottom-up calculation. If your bottom-up analysis yields a market size of $150 billion for streaming, and your Netflix-based comp estimate is $160 billion, your answer becomes much more defensible.

Key Insight: This method shines when you are asked to size complex, global, or niche B2B markets where population-based segmentation is impractical. It demonstrates commercial awareness and a practical, real-world approach to problem-solving.

This technique is frequently used in investment analysis frameworks and is particularly useful for M&A and investment scenarios where understanding market dynamics is critical.

4. Consumption-Based Market Sizing (Per-Capita Approach)

The consumption-based approach is a highly effective method for sizing markets, especially for consumer goods, food, and beverages. Instead of starting with a massive population, you begin with the individual consumer's behavior. This technique involves estimating the average amount of a product a single person consumes (e.g., cups of coffee per year, kilograms of yogurt per month) and then multiplying that by the relevant population.

For instance, when Bain consultants tackle practice market sizing questions like valuing the Indian yogurt market, they start with per-capita consumption. They then segment this by urban vs. rural populations and project how consumption will grow as incomes rise, leading to a much more nuanced and accurate market valuation than a simple top-down approach might yield.

How to Implement This Approach

Success with this method hinges on your ability to make a reasonable assumption about individual consumption and then scale it logically. It forces you to think from the ground up, anchoring your estimate in tangible, everyday behavior.

• Start with Personal Behavior: Anchor your estimate in something you know. For example, "I drink two cups of coffee a day, which is about 700 a year. I'm a heavy user, so let's assume the average is a third of that, around 230 cups per year."
• Segment for Accuracy: A single global or national per-capita figure can be misleading. Break down the population by relevant demographics (age, income, urban vs. rural) and apply different consumption rates to each segment.
• Factor in Price Tiers: Not all consumption is equal in value. Account for different price points by segmenting the market into premium, mid-range, and budget categories and applying a weighted average price.
• Sanity Check Externally: Compare your per-capita assumption to neighboring countries or similar markets. If your estimate for U.S. coffee consumption is ten times that of Canada's, you should re-evaluate your assumptions.

Key Insight: This approach connects your final number directly to human behavior, making your logic transparent and easier to defend. It demonstrates commercial acumen by showing you understand why a market exists.

Mastering this method requires strong mental math for quick calculations. To build this skill, it is helpful to explore tips on how to improve your mental math for case interviews. This technique is a favorite in case materials from BCG and authors like Victor Cheng because it builds a strong, defensible foundation for any B2C market estimate.

5. Channel and Distribution-Based Market Sizing

This approach estimates a market’s size by analyzing its sales channels rather than its end-users. Instead of segmenting the population, you map the primary routes a product takes to reach the customer, such as retail stores, e-commerce platforms, or direct sales forces. By calculating the sales volume flowing through each major channel and summing them up, you can build a credible market estimate from the supply side.

This method is especially useful for understanding how a market operates and where value is captured. For instance, a Bain case might require sizing the athletic apparel market. You could break it down by channel: specialty retail (like Foot Locker), department stores (like Macy's), and direct-to-consumer websites. By estimating the number of stores or online transaction volumes for each, you can construct a detailed market view that also reveals strategic insights about channel mix and profitability.

How to Implement This Approach

A structured channel map is the key to organizing your thoughts and preventing double-counting. Clearly define each channel and state your assumptions about its share of the total market before diving into calculations.

• Map the Channels: Start by identifying all major routes to the customer. A simple flowchart can visualize the flow from manufacturer to end-user.
• Estimate Volume per Channel: For each key channel, calculate its total sales. You can do this by multiplying the number of outlets (e.g., stores) by the average sales per outlet, or for online channels, the number of unique visitors by conversion rate and average order value.
• Aggregate and Sanity Check: Sum the sales from all channels to get the total market size. Check your final number against known industry figures or a quick top-down estimate to ensure it's within a reasonable range.
• Analyze Channel Dynamics: Consider how the channel mix is changing. Is direct-to-consumer growing at the expense of traditional retail? This adds a layer of strategic depth to your answer.

Key Insight: This approach shifts the focus from "who buys" to "where they buy," offering a powerful lens for B2B problems or industries with concentrated distribution networks. It's an essential tool for any practice market sizing questions involving physical goods or complex supply chains.

6. Regulatory and Market Access Constraint Approach

This market sizing method layers in real-world barriers that limit a company's ability to operate, even when customers exist. It acknowledges that the total theoretical market is often much larger than the actually addressable market due to legal, regulatory, and competitive constraints. This approach is critical for practice market sizing questions in heavily regulated industries like finance, healthcare, or energy.

For instance, a private equity case might ask you to size the North American cannabis market. A naive approach would use the total population and assume a certain consumption rate. The regulatory constraint approach would first map out which states and provinces have legalized recreational or medical use, calculate the market within those specific legal jurisdictions, and even factor in price differences between legal and black-market channels. Similarly, a fintech problem would filter the population by who meets regulatory lending criteria, not just who needs a loan.

How to Implement This Approach

Successfully applying this method requires you to think like a strategist, identifying bottlenecks before calculating numbers. The focus shifts from "who wants this?" to "who is allowed to buy this, and who are we allowed to sell to?"

• Map the Barriers: Start by listing all relevant constraints. These can include licenses, patents, geographic restrictions (e.g., state-by-state laws), or rules on advertising and sales.
• Define the Addressable Market: Calculate the market size within the legally permissible boundaries. This becomes your realistic Total Addressable Market (TAM), which is a subset of the theoretical total population.
• Factor in Competitive Moats: Consider how regulations create advantages for incumbents. For example, high capital requirements for new banks or long patent protections for pharmaceuticals create barriers that shrink the accessible market for a new entrant.
• Project Regulatory Changes: A strong analysis will build a timeline. Consider how potential deregulation could expand the market or how new rules could shrink it, adding a dynamic, forward-looking element to your answer.

Key Insight: This approach moves beyond simple demographics to incorporate the complex, non-market forces that truly define a company's opportunity. It demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of how business operates in the real world.

7. Pricing and Willingness-to-Pay Market Sizing

This advanced market sizing approach calculates market value by focusing on customer segments and their willingness to pay (WTP). Instead of just estimating volume, it combines volume with a price discrimination strategy, which is critical for markets with varied customer needs and price sensitivities. This method is especially relevant for practice market sizing questions involving luxury goods, SaaS, and other premium products where a single average price is misleading.

For instance, a McKinsey case on SaaS might require you to size the market by segmenting customers into enterprise, mid-market, and SMB categories. Each segment has a different annual contract value (ACV) and a different number of potential customers. Similarly, a Bain case on luxury handbags would involve estimating sales volumes for different brands at distinct price points, rather than using one average price for all bags.

How to Implement This Approach

Success with this method depends on your ability to create logical customer segments and justify the pricing for each. The key is to build the market size from these price-differentiated segments.

• Segment by Customer or Use Case: Begin by dividing the market into distinct groups based on their needs, size, or purchasing power (e.g., enterprise vs. SMB).
• Estimate WTP for Each Segment: Anchor your price assumptions to known competitor pricing, industry reports, or logical value propositions. For example, an enterprise client would pay more for a SaaS product due to greater needs for security, support, and scalability.
• Build a Pricing Matrix: Organize your thoughts with a simple table outlining segments, key features they value, and corresponding price points. This clarifies your logic.
• Consider Bundling and Upsells: Your average selling price (ASP) calculation should account for opportunities to bundle services or upsell premium features, which can significantly increase the total market value.

Key Insight: This approach moves beyond a simple volume calculation to demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of value creation and revenue strategy. It shows you can think like a strategist, not just an analyst.

8. Growth Rate and Future Market Sizing (Scenario Planning)

Unlike static estimates that capture a market at a single point in time, this advanced approach projects future market size by modeling growth rates. It begins with a solid estimate of the current market and then applies different growth scenarios (e.g., base case, upside, downside) over a defined period. This method is crucial in investment, private equity, and corporate strategy interviews where the focus is on a company's long-term value and market opportunity.

For example, a private equity firm evaluating an e-commerce platform would first size its current market. They would then build a base case projection, perhaps assuming 20% annual growth for five years. An upside scenario might model accelerated growth due to increased market penetration, while a downside case could factor in new competitors or regulations. This forward-looking analysis is essential for valuation and investment theses.

How to Implement This Approach

Successfully projecting market growth requires a clear baseline and well-defended assumptions about the future. The structure should isolate key growth drivers and test their impact under different conditions.

• Establish a Credible Baseline: Start by calculating the current year's market size using a standard method like top-down or bottom-up estimation. Clearly state the source or logic for this initial figure.
• Build Growth from First Principles: Break down the growth rate into its core components. A common formula is: GDP Growth + Category Penetration Growth + Share Shifts. This demonstrates a more sophisticated understanding than just picking a random percentage.
• Develop Scenarios: Create at least three scenarios: conservative, base, and optimistic. For each, explicitly state the assumptions driving the different growth rates (e.g., changes in adoption, pricing power, or new geographies).
• Test for Sensitivity: Identify the most critical assumptions in your model, such as the customer adoption rate or average revenue per user. Briefly explain how changes in these key drivers would impact the final outcome.

Key Insight: This technique shifts the focus from "what is the market size now?" to "what could the market become, and what must be true for that to happen?" It’s a powerful way to test strategic thinking and commercial acumen in practice market sizing questions.

8-Method Market Sizing Comparison

Method	Complexity 🔄	Resources & Data ⚡	Expected Outcomes ⭐📊	Ideal Use Cases 📊	Key Advantages 💡
Fermi Estimation with Top-Down Market Sizing	🔄 Medium — hierarchical breakdowns, fast mental math	⚡ Low — public benchmarks (population, GDP), few inputs	⭐⭐ — quick directional TAM; good for sanity checks	Consulting interviews, early-stage quick estimates	Rapid, easy-to-communicate assumptions; good for sensitivity checks
Bottom-Up Build: Unit Economics Market Sizing	🔄 High — granular units, retention, frequency layers	⚡ High — customer/transaction data, cohort metrics	⭐⭐⭐ — defensible revenue & profitability estimates	VC/PE, SaaS, transaction businesses, profitability analysis	Reveals unit economics & margins; strong Q&A defensibility
Comparable Company Benchmarking	🔄 Medium — select comps and scale via market share	⚡ Medium — public financials, market-share estimates	⭐⭐ — credible if comps are relevant and accurate	IB, PE, mature industries with public peers	Grounded in real financials; quick credible anchor when comps exist
Consumption-Based Market Sizing (Per-Capita Approach)	🔄 Low — simple per-capita × population math	⚡ Low — consumption rates, demographic data	⭐⭐ — intuitive volumetric estimates for consumer goods	CPG, food & beverage, commodity markets	Intuitive, easily validated; good for regional/demographic segmentation
Channel and Distribution-Based Market Sizing	🔄 Medium — mapping channels and channel volumes	⚡ Medium — store counts, channel sales, transaction data	⭐⭐ — channel-specific sales & go-to-market insights	Retail, CPG, market-entry and distribution strategy	Highlights channel economics, access barriers, and shifts in mix
Regulatory and Market Access Constraint Approach	🔄 High — map laws, licenses, and geographic restrictions	⚡ High — regulatory texts, jurisdictional data, legal expertise	⭐⭐⭐ — realistic addressable market after constraints	Healthcare, fintech, cannabis, infrastructure, regulated industries	Produces defensible, risk-adjusted TAM; models policy timing and barriers
Pricing and Willingness-to-Pay Market Sizing	🔄 High — customer segmentation and elasticity modeling	⚡ High — pricing data, competitor ASPs, WTP research	⭐⭐⭐ — revenue-focused TAM with margin implications	Luxury, SaaS, premium products, pricing strategy	Focuses on revenue and price discrimination; tests elasticity and upsell
Growth Rate and Future Market Sizing (Scenario Planning)	🔄 High — multi-scenario growth drivers and sensitivities	⚡ Medium — baseline market data + trend drivers	⭐⭐ — forward-looking projections with upside/downside cases	Valuation, M&A, PE/VC, strategic planning	Produces scenario-based forecasts; identifies key inflection points

Turn Theory Into Interview-Ready Skill

Mastering the art of market sizing is far more than just memorizing formulas; it's about developing a fluid, analytical mindset. Throughout this guide, we've explored a spectrum of techniques, from foundational top-down Fermi estimations to more advanced approaches like regulatory constraint analysis and future market sizing. Each of the eight methods offers a unique lens through which to view a business problem, providing you with a versatile toolkit for any case interview scenario.

The true value of these frameworks emerges not from knowing them individually, but from understanding when and how to combine them. A top-down estimate can be validated with a bottom-up build. A consumption-based model can be refined by layering on pricing and willingness-to-pay considerations. This ability to synthesize different approaches demonstrates a higher level of strategic thinking that interviewers are actively looking for.

From Knowledge to Performance

The gap between understanding a concept and executing it flawlessly under pressure is closed by one thing: deliberate practice. Simply reading about these techniques is not enough. To build the necessary mental agility and confidence, you must actively engage with practice market sizing questions repeatedly.

Here are the critical skills you develop through consistent drills:

• Structuring Speed: Quickly outlining a logical approach before you even touch the numbers.
• Assumption Articulation: Clearly stating your assumptions and justifying why they are reasonable.
• Mental Math Accuracy: Performing calculations quickly and correctly without a calculator.
• Course Correction: The ability to pivot your approach when an interviewer challenges an assumption or introduces a new piece of information.

Beyond understanding the market sizing frameworks, candidates must also develop strong practical skills. To truly turn theory into an interview-ready skill, mastering effective note-taking in interviews is crucial for structuring your thoughts and recalling key details during complex case interviews. A well-organized notepad is your best tool for keeping your logic straight when the pressure is on.

Your Actionable Path Forward

Don't let this knowledge remain passive. Your next step is to apply it. Start by working through the junior-level questions in this article, focusing on building a solid, repeatable process. Time yourself, speak your thought process out loud, and critically review your own solution. As you gain confidence, move on to the more complex, senior-level prompts that require integrating multiple frameworks. The goal is to make structuring and calculating feel like second nature, freeing up your mental bandwidth to focus on delivering sharp, business-savvy insights. This structured repetition is what transforms a candidate who is merely familiar with market sizing into one who can confidently solve any estimation problem thrown their way.

---

Ready to accelerate your learning and get realistic interview practice? Soreno provides an AI-powered platform with an MBB-trained interviewer that gives you unlimited prompts, asks realistic follow-up questions, and delivers instant, rubric-based feedback. Turn your theoretical knowledge into an interview-winning skill by practicing with Soreno today.